There is an article in the July-August number of Foreign Affairs on the magic of easy
money. The author, obviously knowledgeable, as writers in the magazine tend to
be, discusses the huge expansion of the money supply and expresses perplexity
at how it is that prices have not been rising accordingly. Recently I saw a similar puzzlement expressed
in an article found in The Atlantic.
Talented financial writers note that we are flooded with money without price
inflation. They find it even more remarkable in the absence of increased
production of goods and services. You could understand prices not going up if the
production was rising just as quickly, but the current case consists of much
more money chasing after fewer goods and services. How can that be? We don’t
know, they say; it’s a mystery, but it is how it is, and apparently
we can print unlimited money without price inflation resulting.
What they are missing is that the extra money is not chasing
goods and services very hard. The velocity
of money has slowed way down. People
aren’t spending. At least, not quickly. This is a behavior that characterized
the Great Depression. The Social Credit Party recognized the congruence between
the low velocity of money and depression and tried to use their “funny money” to
raise the frequency of economic transactions. The value of their money was programmed to decline by a fixed
amount each week. One had to spend it to get rid of it to avoid the erosion.
The drop in the velocity of money is one indicator that we
are in a depression. I don’t think that we may be sliding into it; I think we
are in the early stages already. It will last for several years, and damage
will be high.
I do not want to imply that the velocity of money is an
independent phenomenon. It is dependent on individuals making decisions about whether
to spend. The question each person has is which do they want more --- the money,
or the goods and services? It appears that right now people have become
inclined to choose money more readily than they were before the pandemic. I
attribute it to their uncertainty about the future.
We might view the velocity of money as nothing more than the
velocity of goods as Henry Hazlitt
argued --- a function of decreased demand. Decreased demand tends towards
economic slowdown: why produce what people don’t want?
My expectation is that once people begin to feel more
certain about the future, or at least more certain about the probability of
some plausible futures, particularly in regards to a decreased likelihood of
outliers they today view with alarm, they will once again be wanting to buy
more. And they will be operating with more cash. The M1 money supply has grown
with the government having created cash out of credit. The result will be a run-up
in prices. The chickens will come
home to roost.
My guess is that we are already in a depression (a lengthy
and deep slowdown in production) which will tend to be a deflationary depression
that will turn into an inflationary depression. People are going to get hurt.
And it will last for several years at least.
No comments:
Post a Comment