Tuesday, August 8, 2017

Knocking the World Economy on its Ass



I was reflecting today on the build up to the Second World War. That munitions war was preceded by a money war --- currency battles and trade battles. I don’t know if I can remember anytime during my lifetime when there seemed to be so much tension between the major economies as there seems to be now. 

Trump campaigned on rhetoric about pegging down China for its unfair trade practices. He has done nothing about that since being elected, probably in hopes that China would fulfill their undertaking to pressure North Korea into ceasing its nuclear weapons program. China has not delivered, and now there is no reason for Trump to not tighten the screws on China. The USA will block Chinese banks and companies trading with North Korea from the dollar exchange system. Sixty-two percent of international currency transfers are in dollars. The dollar is how oil is bought. The dollar is how most big trades occur.

Trump has also now imposed trade sanctions on Russia. Companies that assist the Russian arctic oil industry will be blacklisted on the international dollar bank transfer network. Of course, Europe, which is dependent on Russian petroleum, is miffed. Trump’s actions are a threat to European investors in Russia’s oil industry. What a way to drive Germany and Russia into each other’s arms.

Russia will retaliate. It doesn’t have the economic clout to do it with trade embargos, but it can do it with cyber-attacks. Russia has a army of several thousand hackers for such purposes. If you are in the USA and your bank’s ATMs all go down, or the power goes off over a wide area, or the CME loses its computer network, we’ll have to wonder.

Trump has also put Canada, Mexico and South Korea on notice that the USA doesn’t consider itself obligated by its trade deals. I would not be surprised to see various nations co-operate to set up a bank transfer process that does not depend on or even accept dollars. If that happens, the dollar will likely tank.

One has to wonder what the big war of the 21st century will be. In my opinion, the Seven Years War was the first of the world wars. This eighteenth century war was followed by the nineteenth century Napoleonic Wars. Then came the twentieth century with its major wars. Of course, the centuries prior to the 1700s each had their big wars.  I expect that this century will see some kind of major shooting conflict. Maybe it’s shaping up now. I don’t think Trump will be president when it happens. It would be hard to impeach him now, but after the mid-term elections, if the Democrats make big gains, there may be enough votes to send Trump out on the Richard M. Nixon Memorial Skids. This won’t abate world tensions. It will be too late for that.






Thursday, August 3, 2017

The Bigger They Are.....



Amazon’s PE ratio today is in excess of 250.  The stock, trading at close to a thousand dollars per share when its earnings per share are under $4. Maybe they should have spelled it A-M-A-Z-ING. I could understand this price if Amazon was on the cusp of releasing some world changing technology ---- something that could drive its earnings much higher --- but it’s a company that is a quarter century old and derives over 90% of its revenues from the sale of pretty normal goods. Nothing exciting there. Would you pay $2,500,000 for a hot dog stand that is netting $10,000 per year?  That’s what people are doing here.

I think part of the problem is that so much stock trading is now automatic.  Bot-traders spotting a trend (up) and just buying into it. I expect another problem is institutional traders who were pre-pubescent when Netscape was trading at 100 times earnings and then disappeared along with many other dot-coms.  

Shareholders may be giddy from the rarified atmosphere into which this and many other stocks have risen. Euphoria.  But laugh now and cry later. This is unsustainable. Sooner or later the bots will spot the inevitable downtrend and drive the stock into the dirt, and the panicked gen-X traders will discover that the keyboard has a Sell button.

Thursday, July 20, 2017

The Future of the Middle East



I haven’t noticed Donald Trump making noises about bringing peace to the Middle East. Maybe he has the good sense to realize he can’t do it.
Why is there such enmity in that region? It is popular to blame it on the artificial national borders that were arbitrarily drawn through ethnic regions, splitting clans apart and mixing peoples who aren’t comfortable with each other. Maybe that helps to explain ISIS, but it doesn’t explain the Old Man in the Mountain or any of the other pre-1900s struggles there.
Who can bring peace to the Middle East? Only God can do that. Look at the main powers today. The USA has lost interest parallel to oil losing its high price, and has never been able to pull off a peace there.  Russia has some interest, but lacks the economic capacity to do anything significant.
The 5 main regional powers are Israel, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey.  Israel has no interest in empire or in uniting the Islamic world. Iran’s internal troubles are too much for her to do anything; ditto for Egypt. Plus Iran is being watched carefully by the USA. Saudi Arabia has economic trouble and is caught up in its effort to have a real Arabian makeover: new leadership, new industries.  Maybe hard to do for a country where one octogenarian king is succeeded by another octogenarian. The Crown Price is young though.
Turkey is the only power with a chance of bringing the region together. It might not be a peaceful peace, but it would be a peace of a kind ---- the Ottoman kind. Turkey has the biggest economy of any Islamic country except far-away Indonesia. Turkey has a focused and seemingly capable leader.  George Friedman may well be correct when he predicts the resurrection of the Ottoman Empire.